Then, the last data shown is particularly significant: November 2, - Eleven states pass constitutional amendments defining marriage as being between a man and a woman only: This is the first time same-sex marriage has been approved by a popular vote in the United States. Follow us RSS feed. Harvard Law ReviewNew Haven, vol. No longer may this liberty be denied to them.
Do you think that marriages between same-sex couples should or should not be recognized by the law as valid, with the same rights as traditional marriages?
The Nature of the Institution of Marriage One of the central differences between arguments made by petitioners and respondents in Obergefell - and between those on opposite sides of the marriage debate more generally - is whether same-sex marriage is simply an extension of the well-recognized institution or fundamentally changes long-held notions of marriage. While referendums can be an important component of democracy, the manner in which they are construed and invoked should not step beyond the boundaries of international human rights law. Marriage is sacred to those who live by their religion and offers unique fulfillment to those who find meaning in the secular realm.
If the amendment passes the committee stage, it will then be voted on at the plenary session of the Legislative Yuan in